Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cat-file: add --batch-command mode

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:

> There is overlap, yes. I'm not sure of the best way to resolve it,
> though. John mentions a substantial reduction ("roughly half") of Git
> processes [1], and if they foresee needing to access things other than
> object info and contents, it might be better to start with something
> more extensible, like my proposal for a specific batch command.

I agree that it would be ideal to have just one way generic and
extensible enough.  I do not know if there are much difference in
that area between the two approaches, though.  The RFC I saw did
look more complex and rigidly specified with framing and such, but
that is only the syntax part---in the way in which interaction
between two processes happen, I didn't quite see fundamental
differences.  I'd expect it wouldn't be too much trouble to add new
commands to code written using either approach (although I haven't
seen yours yet ;-).

Thanks.