From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FE0C433E0 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 22:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AB064E55 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 22:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229632AbhCNWqG (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:46:06 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:62008 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229505AbhCNWqA (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:46:00 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630CE125995; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:46:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mtDz8rJD1mBUG+ddTApiB/EoYh8=; b=i5iL0a c3z69HDL4BSI355pnhT1Obpm10j/XKY6lkWE/KOBGuvIpvnY8S7dQpD58Hth/kQ+ tUztg+9DeVZPhkH5UKcJqppx001rI7B7aObhB/o7m8DFcpJf44Qg0MFGBaV52/qB xjfS5BHI1g3ApacBlBF43nkBL4We1ta7IGzC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kWV8jWH2KSbIF3WRdI9bh8AEqP6XpV9R 9GpGZHRN5frkhzN38wTyT8DIK7d85s5MEG1EQRFjEpclyMdbFaSdHIKvKHwNiU0W Rja8H6X42tVOhSHhjOx4Z7SrycdL6KooVNJ3+qCF90uAvr9p7Ryq8Pu8m5BnaEwO TY1npP/XTqs= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8BC125994; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:46:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F2EB125993; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:45:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Christian Couder Cc: ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget , git , "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Brandon Casey , Shourya Shukla , ZheNing Hu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [GSOC] commit: add trailer command References: Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 15:45:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Christian Couder's message of "Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:19:01 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0ACA105A-8517-11EB-B01C-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Christian Couder writes: > Ok, I agree that it's a good idea to have a good generic solution > first, before having specialized options for specific trailers. > >> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-901%2Fadlternative%2Fcommit-with-multiple-signatures-v2 >> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-901/adlternative/commit-with-multiple-signatures-v2 >> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/901 >> >> Range-diff vs v1: > > If this patch series has very few code and commit messages in common > with a previous attempt at implementing similar features, it might be > better to make it a new patch series rather than a v2. This could > avoid sending range-diffs that are mostly useless. Thanks for all the good suggestions.