Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] repack: support repacking into a geometric sequence

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:


>     ++	/*
>     ++	 * order packs by descending mtime so that objects are laid out
>     ++	 * roughly as newest-to-oldest
>     ++	 */
>      +	if (a->mtime < b->mtime)
>      +		return 1;
>     ++	else if (b->mtime < a->mtime)
>     ++		return -1;
>      +	else
>      +		return 0;

I think this strategy makes sense when this repack using this new
feature is run for the first time in a repository that acquired many
packs over time.  I am not sure what happens after the feature is
used a few times---it won't always be the newest sets of packs that
will be rewritten, but sometimes older ones are also coalesced, and
when that happens the resulting pack that consists primarily of older
objects would end up having a more recent timestamp, no?

Even then, I do agree that newer to older would be beneficial most
of the time, so this is of course not an objection against this
particular sort order.