From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] object name: introduce '^{/!-}' notation Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:52:14 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1433550295-15098-1-git-send-email-wmpalmer@gmail.com> <1433550295-15098-3-git-send-email-wmpalmer@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Will Palmer X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 28 18:52:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrUta-0005IW-CK for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:52:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755585AbbJ1RwS (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:52:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:53324 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755117AbbJ1RwR (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:52:17 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BE723362; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:52:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gPXiV86H356cEz34bUUJJdQrFyw=; b=RFyi/D AmxUUetOOlXPLclNo7j3K9kUkNv/HeaXRF+8FyGN2nn3SY1l2j1/E8MPD3eXDxMS qK5qlp7XHwreEt0EHrbN3KI5pAD8YJBMnc3NN5WpzUYZAIM+HCoV8Z/ZqCcRgIqS 1/ybNYTNS/8ji4W4QayBmJdYD9TQa6VMdCYXk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=AAX3xHbS9S1HRSEUlDeOX1lOwqh8KXRF x+2xoOCfvXJN558RsZgXOvLCB/SvXycGINdRnhNKA+uGJt398MJCaa4t8ettEtKN 8K2hHoPnkfOC+Uu/U1La0qDbUE5Dp40q0ryKrCgz2e2Jdgl5pidC16kXdzDnTyeb hoM7hzveVFg= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0898423360; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:52:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [216.239.45.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 084CD2335E; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:52:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Will Palmer's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:14:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A02F11D2-7D9C-11E5-BE06-6BD26AB36C07-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Will Palmer writes: > In summary: it looks like I'll be sending another one. Has anything happened to this topic since then? I am asking primarily because I want to decide if I should discard wp/sha1-name-negative-match topic from my tree [*1*]. I think what it attempts to do is a worthy thing, and it is shame to see the initial implementation and review cycles we have spent so far go to waste. [Footnote] *1* Not that my dropping a topic from 'pu' means very much; a dropped topic can still be submitted and requeued after all.