From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22003C433F5 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 00:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EB360E52 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 00:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233998AbhIHA12 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:27:28 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56120 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231983AbhIHA11 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:27:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2327DE1059; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:26:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=K6FA5tD1u6LSP2JNNsSShflPLrL6Te8gLtof2t 5ZBNg=; b=xH9NjBhMekUbpsQGaWXj7+UaxIB8fFdX2MLdWIeP2fKOuGPQx3SlXv +8SpTPbk/BMrZBzu4Ft8YwszcO8fz4VcgJ2IVQX19eCxJdT/4Yu5Oh530MVCqxdv badCetJ1lYLVvJ9JAUE/wZRdmsW8Ldh/N+LNlXGxzRHV7lCcFCH6Q= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B72AE1058; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:26:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.172.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90B18E1057; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:26:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, matheus.bernardino@usp.br Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] In grep, no adding submodule ODB as alternates References: Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 17:26:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Tan's message of "Mon, 16 Aug 2021 14:09:50 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 63437BCC-103B-11EC-9D00-CD991BBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: > Thanks for reviewing, everyone. Here are the requested changes. > > Jonathan Tan (8): > submodule: lazily add submodule ODBs as alternates > grep: use submodule-ODB-as-alternate lazy-addition > grep: typesafe versions of grep_source_init > grep: read submodule entry with explicit repo > grep: allocate subrepos on heap > grep: add repository to OID grep sources > submodule-config: pass repo upon blob config read > t7814: show lack of alternate ODB-adding I didn't see anybody comment on this round (and do not think I saw anything glaringly wrong). Is everybody happy with this version? I am about to mark it for 'next' in the next issue of "What's cooking" report, so please holler if I should wait. Thanks.