From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECAEC43142 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 00:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD58564E6C for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 00:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355382AbhCDAXt (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:23:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59739 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1387902AbhCCTe5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:34:57 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8399CBD2B0; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:29:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ivaAsbUjw5+lehF6K47apihi5JE=; b=EeGlUB c4aBPr7f/SiKulGCu6OtzSV2YrOGBA9AMwKjUSi2pGSVOjDmtZP5iPeCfGP/J6Ic ovCEhDnFomr2Y1jTQtMv9Slhl7J2lT3a3FhYxZepa3zQmrrEJAecZEj5uqD8GwZh uYw35sj+/T2OkBLTuUZsa0E5C5Rgqk8OZctNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MluIJoFS5gIKZM8hnBH37OEDrTjfmoc/ u+MIxKgNVT5t/sYKk57cVubPtHipSBV8J5CSCvwD4cyzuN9NpZPZZX9H0mywUtCu Xm2uMmyQQ0Wu5aRdjfIFIrQGASPgm+wN7m/42o1syLn4ZAjVJc/BlEeNgTKrExao dNky7wjA8zQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77888BD2AF; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:29:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E181CBD2AE; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:29:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Jeff Hostetler , Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1?= =?utf-8?Q?bor?= , Johannes Schindelin , Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] Simple IPC Mechanism References: Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 11:29:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:50:21 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B9B28382-7C56-11EB-A96E-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > And by "not interested" I don't mean that I think the topic is without > value. Far from it; I think this is an important area to be working in. > But it's complex and time-consuming to review. So I was hoping somebody > with more expertise and interest in the problem space would do that part > of the review, and I could continue to focus on other stuff. That may be > wishful thinking, though. :) I was not paying close attention to this series, and was planning to visit it before merging it to 'next' but only to ensure that changes to any existing code would not regress existing callers, so it seems that we two have been with pretty much the same attitude;-)