From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BBF20133 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 00:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752064AbdCDASw (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:18:52 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:65111 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751742AbdCDASv (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:18:51 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A73D689A9; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:03:44 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4X3SKD4uBd5TL8xF0DpfLJ/vRLc=; b=Qk2NqI hekwc2b97vwEvCLK+0npJgB5uySehoz6JcJBQkmwrfLjfQuKwgrrQezf03f37gAt RBxmlN2zf8iUxHAJd0hR2EzZZYcN8kgvz8teGWG3OAZZLJeope4NA44/K5zhn/QD NabTZtlQymTvW9rpUTpxJ5xO2PI/2zp1uvSaU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=I8OeZA4EFuaTOqWyymDh5+UFeZH078fo ZDgCWCgOAJ3Ch31ff5b/hJZkRwVBXu+PPluqtAeqs7iz+W/h/ceGgkuOLHdYn097 FJZs1Da4yA2xjiKdrDAJBEeH9+HVsFKGBw0UnyCwepZkLb8WTgwtgeEuqnp5dcPr UCEnbtivujk= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133F4689A7; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 770D3689A6; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:03:43 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lars Schneider , Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Travis: also test on 32-bit Linux References: <20170302105157.59791-1-larsxschneider@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 16:03:42 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 03 Mar 2017 10:43:44 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 07C7251E-006E-11E7-AD8F-FC50AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > I see he did v2 which you Acked in a different thread. Will replace > what's been on 'pu' and running with Travis the past few days with > it. Let's wait for one or more Travis cycles and then merge it to > 'next'. https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/207517043 is an output from 'pu' with the v2 patch; it seems to have fell into a funny state. The output ends like so: No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself. I only recently started looking at Travis logs, so I cannot tell if it is just a usual flake (e.g. some builds a few days ago seems to have failed due to not being able to check out the tree being tested, which I do not think is our fault) that we shouldn't worry about, or if it is a sign of a real problem. Unrelated to linux-32, the same build has hard failure with Apple clang in t0021 with the rot13-filter.pl thing, by the way.