Re: [PATCH] diff-files: treat "i-t-a" files as "not-in-index"

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

>> +	touch empty &&
>
> Use of "touch" gives a wrong impression that you care about the file
> timestamp; use something like ": >empty &&" instead when you care
> about the presence of the file and do not care about its timestamp.

I just realized that this is even more important in this case not to
use "touch".

The test that uses this file cares not just the presence, but it
deeply cares that its contents is empty.  The thing it least cares
about is its timestamp.

The purpose of using "touch" is to update the timestamp, to keep the
current contents if it exists, and to ensure it exists (as a side
effect), in the decreasing order of importance.  Use of the command
here misleads the readers.

Thanks.