From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25F020954 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752627AbdLGVVn (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 16:21:43 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56945 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750947AbdLGVVl (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 16:21:41 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D52C5106; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 16:21:40 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=KoFgUk1AdzhJwk7TSwpyhYoGkIs=; b=nsj+et hX7HWjfOolozEUWP7TIrewf07ei9VjkvbpDkV+iMmGhXjejAISB6PTVrZzQxVPUy QXIVUN5g5IFMlTm2cYZcQSXV/8T67R3sr9MRyZmX1K0mcr93HVRXoCADEjG1kGms ZhiMlyaduqlm9QXQhuiGtUwW+YYL0o+6tErwU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=R6SRoW8LfKQlSHoD5sRNQGsmQzlcMJJM dlCsISoPFB8wj3Ia+mWlUOHhSVDLAbt0amny53Xwg+/w5M5jkz2ZVE3RM8zS7Zop ZaB6n50GgYg+nH5d4+Tr+trwBCN3Do3VHZcgSXtFpqNc/iJJHQaiIUF50+2RPRBq KT/RHPlIork= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A70FC5105; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 16:21:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9ECBC5104; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 16:21:39 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lars Schneider Cc: Todd Zullinger , Johannes Schindelin , Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2017, #01; Mon, 4) References: <20171207202201.GA3693@zaya.teonanacatl.net> <71F9850F-5D7F-4CDE-8408-E000ADD48406@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:21:38 -0800 In-Reply-To: <71F9850F-5D7F-4CDE-8408-E000ADD48406@gmail.com> (Lars Schneider's message of "Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:08:02 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9D518712-DB94-11E7-9B5C-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Lars Schneider writes: >> The acl stuff hasn't changed for a long time and I do not think of a >> reason offhand why the test should behave differently between say >> 'maint' and 'pu', yet 'maint' is passing while 'pu' is not... > > My recent 657343a602 (travis-ci: move Travis CI code into dedicated scripts, > 2017-09-10) change might have broken that somehow... But the puzzling thing is that commit is in 'maint' as well as 'pu'.