From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE85C433F5 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 17:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE69611CA for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 17:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231301AbhJCRfC (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2021 13:35:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:52034 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230504AbhJCRfC (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2021 13:35:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79131160E83; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 13:33:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=zTPtWUBxXCeJ xHC3lWqj2F6tx3oZDDBaDijxcgk3IS8=; b=Q5R2fGStvtSYqQrHEa0upMey9P4C v6pYlPnKbiruLR6iqrdYwgYVt3L+K7Z0/bxxBDa7zaf9jsv2FE+VpZ3GfmSVYk2Y GR2g65LBUxIyHXdJtnT7P/N7sW5wSmZ8sX3iE2kwq7RDugC5oYyyoI5EZgXyZ45l px1hdKmEXDlmdAY= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CED1160E82; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 13:33:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A893B160E80; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 13:33:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Git List Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] test-mergesort: add test subcommand References: <943b1e01-465e-5def-a766-0adf667690de@web.de> <522fba5e-1048-3377-45c1-7107b55dc6e1@web.de> <87o887q0s9.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <850aa059-61d9-0eba-5809-e0c27a19dfb4@web.de> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 10:33:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: <850aa059-61d9-0eba-5809-e0c27a19dfb4@web.de> (=?utf-8?Q?=22R?= =?utf-8?Q?en=C3=A9?= Scharfe"'s message of "Sun, 3 Oct 2021 12:15:21 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FB4270C0-246F-11EC-8DF4-98D80D944F46-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ren=C3=A9 Scharfe writes: > Repeatable tests are not essential (the original paper didn't mention > seeding), but shouldn't be much trouble to implement and would simplify > comparisons across versions, systems and among testers. > > The only downside I can think of is that it may perhaps also simplify > over-fitting, i.e. I might find micro-tweaks that only work for our > specific rand() sequence and then misinterpret them as general > improvements.. Yup, I think you summarized the pros-and-cons nicely.