From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C85CC4338F for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 20:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D516054E for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 20:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233406AbhHSU0t (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 16:26:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:57662 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229660AbhHSU0t (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 16:26:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91945157F38; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 16:26:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=q/2NNBRqOOlz LfIptQDcJ6QSlYvw5Vx6HxmqSslvpvI=; b=CcJ6wh7YfgWsBFemsi+qRAQezYMz YohUHfgj2cV3pazBKP25pHyb4YX7lXjwIb+ogUOBUuzZpxIGfbrsnzigBOUsevyb A5iylY45IJIVbcesetDhuYZYOtRikC3C2p/Jr6604c4Yp4h4+X0Lyzo31Z15ifKm tCjvR83UGvXP4m8= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E0A157F37; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 16:26:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.116.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1B28157F35; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 16:26:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?Q?Bel=C3=B3n?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, hanwen@google.com, Jeff King , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] t3200: refactor symlink test from hn/refs-errno-cleanup References: <20210819050103.25995-1-carenas@gmail.com> <20210819075244.36776-1-carenas@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:26:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20210819075244.36776-1-carenas@gmail.com> ("Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?Q?Bel=C3=B3n=22's?= message of "Thu, 19 Aug 2021 00:52:44 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B08ABEDC-012B-11EC-B64F-D5C30F5B5667-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Carlo Marcelo Arenas Bel=C3=B3n writes: > d1931bcf0d (refs: make errno output explicit for refs_resolve_ref_unsaf= e, > 2021-07-20) add a test for a crash when refs is a symlink, but it fails > on windows. > > add the missing SYMLINKS dependency and while at it, refactor it slight= ly > to comply better with the CodingGuidelines. > > Reported-by: Jeff King > Helped-by: Eric Sunshine > Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Bel=C3=B3n > --- > v2: > * update subject for clarity; might be worth squashing instead into 3d6= 3ce75e > (refs: explicitly return failure_errno from parse_loose_ref_contents, > 2021-07-20) > * change from --git-dir to -C for clarity > * add reporting for errors to the for loop as suggested by Eric Thanks for a fix-up. Let's eject hn/refs-errno-cleanup and possibly ab/refs-files-cleanup topics out of 'next' and give these 18 patches a chance for a fresh start, as I've already failed a short-cut attempt to squash in the "fix" yesterday that forgot the SYMLINKS prerequisite and even today's attempts to fix it seem to be going back and forth X-<. Even worse, there is a t0031 breakage that seems to have come from the latter topic. IOW, I won't be picking this up but asking Han-Wen and =C3=86var to come up with a clean reroll of the two series. Thanks.