From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAA1C433F5 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D1960E09 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237808AbhIVU76 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:59:58 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:57484 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237786AbhIVU75 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:59:57 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186EBFEDAF; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:58:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=yYg94Jo14BnOlItbZDn0BTIG0pDfmCbggNpwHq GtXOg=; b=S7GlDEB7pkSFoU6evjzgI/v6vy4shutIvx7arjZJoG1Mjc1BBfcufn BouZ3y0ePnNoIWHEBRLa8FR0DhHxsT5GbytmKGgkGBWfVQOfACVxAyH0lBsCLvbk lDYVKDxWj5PnuxOCoEM062U5gfhzWDE4ciF1m2uD5InkSp1kkPI2Q= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC27FEDAE; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:58:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73B59FEDAD; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:58:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Bagas Sanjaya , git@vger.kernel.org, wolf@oriole.systems Subject: Re: [PATCH] rev-parse: fix mismatch quoting of separator in the message References: <20210922111744.675326-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> <87bl4k7532.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:58:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:08:25 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D4E705E8-1BE7-11EC-94B0-62A2C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > I agree. But for what it's worth, I think we should: > > - accept patches, such as this one, which move things in a positive > direction > > - not spend a ton of time or reviewer bandwidth on conversions > throughout the tree > > In other words, I'm happy to see patches like this, or little clean-ups > along the way in related areas, but I would be unhappy to see a massive > patch to change all instances from one to the other. Oh, absolutely. But let's not accept a small patch that swaps one bad style `--' to another bad one `--`, which does not improve anything.