Re: ds/bundle-uri (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #06; Fri, 20))

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> writes:

> On 5/21/22 3:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> * ds/bundle-uri (2022-05-20) 32 commits
>>  - t5601: basic bundle URI tests
>>  - clone: unbundle the advertised bundles
>>  - bundle-uri: download bundles from an advertised list
>>  - bundle-uri: allow relative URLs in bundle lists
>>  - bundle-uri client: add boolean transfer.bundleURI setting
>>  - bundle-uri: serve URI advertisement from bundle.* config
>>  - bundle-uri client: add "git ls-remote-bundle-uri"
>>  - bundle-uri client: add minimal NOOP client
>>  - protocol v2: add server-side "bundle-uri" skeleton
>>  - bundle-uri: fetch a list of bundles
>>  - bundle-uri: parse bundle list in config format
>>  - bundle-uri: limit recursion depth for bundle lists
>>  - bundle-uri: unit test "key=value" parsing
>>  - bundle-uri: create "key=value" line parsing
>>  - bundle-uri: create base key-value pair parsing
>>  - bundle-uri: create bundle_list struct and helpers
>>  - clone: --bundle-uri cannot be combined with --depth
>>  - clone: add --bundle-uri option
>>  - fetch: add 'refs/bundle/' to log.excludeDecoration
>>  - fetch: add --bundle-uri option
>>  - bundle-uri: add support for http(s):// and file://
>>  - bundle-uri: create basic file-copy logic
>>  - remote-curl: add 'get' capability
>>  - docs: document bundle URI standard
> ...
>>  source: <pull.1234.git.1653072042.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
>
> These patches are for the combined bundle URI RFC. I
> appreciate that you're tracking them, but they aren't ready
> for full review, since they are missing a lot of tests.
> First, we need to establish that the overall design is a
> good approach. After that consensus is reached, I expect
> that this series to be split into several parts that are
> more manageable to review bit-by-bit. 

Split the above into a separate topic; thanks.