From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47E120248 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 02:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729303AbfCYC1J (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Mar 2019 22:27:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:37797 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729255AbfCYC1J (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Mar 2019 22:27:09 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id w10so8295676wrm.4 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:27:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=7Cv+xxH1jBPR7rNbFO9q8dJkHgm73ZnQSygfsQhoeHg=; b=GPmOShKbbHpXw3mr+MXWkL2Ld71OilegPictcrXWx3y6JeB6/2lTgR5HB3WLYcTaf4 CqfZAZYxfUiuvCcQGlkm6m03Qsbyidu4Ckuwciz/b5x0TBUPtna8owTlkoaHyUe3uI2m dFCcw7xCc+gcjsiFkC87ctmCY5V7UIMcaa2e3ELykIe17wIHLMSxAM0zA3u6SnfIKuFY PS8BBqS0EWiyORkwjBapUK9S6LFWM11sJR6DFn9EHnMM/cz2VjUOit9eDem8nlNkCPsc zqk7HLA9Raa+/ikP9NybA0HTqyF4G8gvBIvzO1mC/NCUx+F9elakWwMAkJ2AnFAI39zi wYUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=7Cv+xxH1jBPR7rNbFO9q8dJkHgm73ZnQSygfsQhoeHg=; b=JpSBTbvnN2qKSAAcAM9aC4HHDLZ+rAYXtonLLhHMdX0G8++EuE/joswYGgVPLqjmFa c6zzszMvIIeg5od+Cq5sEaIyjE4VbVL7lt5+84l8ePdSh8Jgcd+X+33NN1tbVbNu/sDS H7C7st0hyORI2niW6nRWSvMCWHxWRGpmEpQXzwMG6Ovog/atKV2pNKtan+C7e29oD17e HqlWPE8PoftnOqPcj0HMLFuidZi1aMAVxUxY8Tgyixn4TlSnI3mlyIIzRyKmMvgTxZcP drsz2HX+nb/YRYSkS8AZbMxXuES50R4eh03RE4QYB7fgUNKPYKYsQhBsxiEMa4HP/adh PFOw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVhCj6SNa0EdQBvBuGrNEiGoHfOH20a3MiJZWtnH/srCqacb3iU +jaL2CQeYOTNiQfFY2Hh+gmNnMGvFQA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqym4V8n8v/iIld+t3M4cfYdEdUvYRJNjQznWFg+8fH7pX4hEUCefptP8ucVYzegz8O2Bn5dbA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6252:: with SMTP id m18mr13180314wrv.199.1553480827624; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (141.255.76.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.76.255.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k14sm12016859wmj.26.2019.03.24.19.27.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:27:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git tag -v should verify that the tag signer intended the same tag name as the user is verifying References: <875zsdu41d.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87imwbmqpg.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87k1goia52.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:27:06 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87k1goia52.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> (Daniel Kahn Gillmor's message of "Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:07:21 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > What do you think of my updated proposal for tag.verifyNameMatch ? Meh to slightly negative for hard-coding project-specific preference to the core tools. "We give you --format so go wild in your project to do verification your project likes." I think was the conclusion of the previous round of discussions, and I do not think we saw any new arguments in this round to rethink it in a different way.