From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636211F4F8 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754047AbcI1UeF (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:34:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51203 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753483AbcI1UeE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:34:04 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0634E401D4; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:34:03 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ngPkbaFhNiwd8ZMImxhYvQi/bQw=; b=v/Zaaw wQL4ch60q15Z1Lk7xsMcD1EG+e8TbqMxamKbvg6HS50ActupQDSheA13KRiJ4bkA 3CRVCZwyX5OulJS9b5paiq6pvALO/Xn67oZ/mhXERnMOoEeE0+616FpyoMfalgmH GLFdxfZyO7bfCFdkJPy0T170w6uRPXDH6gE60= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DnesMTO6PCxnLNzwDoDk53Xa7DsgtwWt H49d60bnllEN9e6MEls3Po0pXzNgu56U2A/bgjdjumch5ZxiAvDknxN53TYNhMnh ZI/1ulsl2l+IABmVHZkGNX7Nf2AFYSh6r+8dZsbKy7hhUWkJIS+Ad6XBMzmE3fRB JsfrfCkIuAU= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33B6401D3; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FD79401D2; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:34:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Resurrect "diff-lib.c: adjust position of i-t-a entries in diff" References: <20160928114348.1470-1-pclouds@gmail.com> <20160928114348.1470-2-pclouds@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:33:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:28:00 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E47FCE5E-85BA-11E6-9789-EAAE7A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > As I already said, --shift-ita is not quite descriptive and I think > it should be renamed to something else, but I kept that in the > following attempt to rewrite: > ... Please do not use that verbatim; it was full of typo and grammo. > After reading the three patches through, however, I do not think we > use the command line option anywhere. I'm inclined to say that we > shouldn't add it at all. Or at least do so in a separate follow-up > patch "now we have an internal mechanism, let's expose it anyway" at > the end. Which means that the last sentence in my attempted rewrite > should go. > > The patch to diff-lib.c machinery looks good. > > Thanks.