From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206E4C433F5 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0328A61221 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345167AbhITTcB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:32:01 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61839 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347008AbhITTaA (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:30:00 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2855EEEFB; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:28:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=TqG2ndwlECgs V+AHnMBR22KQ8+QWCT2v6w4sxjKsm9g=; b=aUBVMi91NIk804lq1qjr73nlDIzB JTWrXDG1dzpFGbijhKn4NMVU4iuE91Fp7qcEjjtC3JteyMAmA1zhJApC7Zsdnm1r QlnnUzMq80jq50JtVJp0fuhsdocLviKUANVyqKgkw2uhG/X/rl1GICskAX0NROUs ZpJuXr3aYvNlnKA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE65EEEFA; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:28:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5019BEEEF9; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:28:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Fangyi Zhou , git@vger.kernel.org, Peter Kaestle , Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] .mailmap: Update mailmap entry for Fangyi Zhou and Peter Kaestle References: <20210920084719.29122-1-me@fangyi.io> <877dfbbigr.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:28:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: <877dfbbigr.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:18:58 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F0E9C9EC-1A48-11EC-B351-62A2C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > I understand per recent mailmap discussion that Junio prefers having th= e > entries sorted over eliminating redundancy. I have merely stated the project preference that can be seen in the state of the file, which may not necessarily my preference (and my preference would matter much less than project concensus, especially because I do not have a strong one on this matter anyway).