From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063FBC2D0CE for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BCA20882 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="R5/HgKig" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729261AbgAURxu (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:53:50 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59336 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728186AbgAURxt (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:53:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE2A56DAE; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:53:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=e2UzFOrzBLvi yBKt0EftbCBz76U=; b=R5/HgKigK6/u8KYEHt/SXJgxOYdabULvMn6A2bhyCmx6 FRoh8X3YCTVtg5UIO1lTGR/7nWACefGG4Z0R6iSmISHpwxL0xqlgXIyACafUFXDy h/GXCdkN+O8QKKSzHxZ6Dlh/ftlUjpnKGT0vSWBQYyIpMgE1NgmwOiL4Np+IoYY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=HlPsu/ dNY+5ZZfiK6cEWl7ol3V/ADKlCddg7M9/lvR2Cw/3EYhLPtFKaWGSGUDqg4p6ZwP wxHpVvjaYrmR6AF6swzY7aV1FhKTNy7Nl0DjZMF3oTyF/E3bPk4vFOwQz+EgnBus GOu7ZwSTMS5BbA5+VrAzBj/Oi77HAXdZS5VUs= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AEA56DAD; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:53:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D2FD56DAC; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:53:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Philippe Blain , jrnieder@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patchwork instance "Submitter" attribution and GitGitGadget References: <75987318-A9A7-4235-8B1D-315B29B644E8@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:53:45 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:16:02 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F911F45C-3C76-11EA-825A-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Sat, 18 Jan 2020, Philippe Blain wrote: > >> I=E2=80=99ve noticed that all (I think) patch series sent to the list = using >> Gitgitgadget are attributed to Dscho (Submitter is "Johannes Schindeli= n >> via GitGitGadget") on the patchwork instance [1]. I don=E2=80=99t know= if you >> are aware of that or if there=E2=80=99s a way to fix it in patchwork=E2= =80=A6 > > Right now, it shows "Lucius Hu via GitGitGadget". Clearly, patchwork us= es > only the email address as identifier, being unprepared to accept that t= he > same email address might be used by multiple contributors. Would it help to use the "Sender:" header? IIUC right now GGG records its name on "From:" with its e-mail and a human-readable name derived from the author of the ptach, but if it can record the true author on "From:" and leave GGG's name on the "Sender:", would patchwork use the "From:" side of the identity instead? If that works, it would have an additional benefit of not having to add the in-body "From:" to override the mail-header "From:", to avoid attributing the authorship to GGG.