From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463A820229 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755677AbcJUSkg (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:40:36 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:61037 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755567AbcJUSkf (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:40:35 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D0848B7D; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:40:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Oy4q2WXi0MkD3IkWezy+x7smn6M=; b=gY1ENB gvRuT32+qMldmumh5S5wWShfGNZeIsJ1acdzmgppUKBARJXbu9iKqumuEqzQohrp GzX2sFkNmndMhSSJAlFWJUzhVwXULLaJnDSACmVj5BxJDwx8C+h3u7avNFdVfaEj CMnUuStbagXmOZ90kuzEOUK+QvLl+FX9Iw+Ys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KUv13PvC0S9768jUziq9UrbwBT2HtysK LNvboi4wXdoQHY+WgLW5pQF8VTYC76ohQhsVza7/ZaIZiQ5FfZb8puOGYSWPkNfq yZwM3UKJ0iP0fS8dG269eTjS+2vhq3M7GR5A4pgth9n+QikwJM50oajsPCSqMGRs oxpQYtHXSdI= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDA448B7C; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:40:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29E1548B7B; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:40:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= , Johannes Sixt , Ramsay Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] Prepare the sequencer for the upcoming rebase -i patches References: Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:40:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:23:45 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D94F9EBE-97BD-11E6-A73C-3AB77A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Changes vs v4: I still do not understand (note that I am not saying "I do not accept"--acceptance or rejection happens after an understandable explanation is given, and "do not understand" means no such explanation has been given yet) your justification behind adding a technical debt to reimplement the author-script parser and not sharing it with "git am" in 13/27. As I pointed out, I think 22/27 is out of place in this series. But other than these two points, the changes since v4 look minimum, and they all looked good to me. Thanks.