From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F45CC48BE5 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 03:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DF06109E for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 03:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230174AbhFUDqU (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:46:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:51514 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229905AbhFUDqT (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:46:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E59F14C11D; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:44:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=o0fGq0Gza9DUFHp+5pMr2/jjB qcXJoWEf5/G8QYwOXQ=; b=DZs2yS+f3S3VVbEVKmHsx1ErnneuxUtgNf4NVqW+S v1pXlynxgZSBz6k/73iH6dcVLCc6KjEBC7EVrGR01mAtXLBxG+S0KjQrw5lXpS+O J+2asaMNGgYe/e5Qdu40jt7ly+mhbGo5Lg0btPFDk/NUU1N0NLb32tXiGajmkjlY vM= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470A414C11C; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:44:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.36.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E85B14C11B; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:44:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Emily Shaffer , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Taylor Blau , Felipe Contreras , Eric Sunshine , "brian m . carlson" , Josh Steadmon , Jonathan Tan , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/30] hook: add 'run' subcommand References: <87lf7bzbrk.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87im2848pn.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:44:02 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EC1E7212-D242-11EB-A67A-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > I think since Junio picked up the "base" version of this and it looks > like we're going that way first that's not something we need to discuss > now if you'd like to punt it, but I'd really like to get that cleared u= p > post-base topic. I queued this 'base' thing only because (1) Emily promised to review it and I wanted to give her a version of "seen" she can try to build on the part beyond "refactoring", (2) I wanted to see how the 'base' looks myself and (3) I wanted to see what possible interactions with other topics in flight I should anticipate, if we were to decide to go that route. Please do not read more than that into what is and what is not in 'seen'.