From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005BD1F4F8 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932678AbcJNRFA (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:05:00 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59031 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932631AbcJNRE6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:04:58 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F274503B; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:04:51 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=vJ8LAMm44rwROsfbrBK692gWSOg=; b=Sr+j61 vhnTliR6Sl478wy4ccZRxeB8yOe13azKYjzfz2BtHhSGP8LO2RAywpWqWFD/dQj5 GY7Pqn5wsLRLGnkZm8me/4QhLqgIgTMYauZMsXdWn9hckfsWtIBDWr+lhJ/e6U7b VtivvgUQlZXVya4yrlG6N9iUzR6nRiVsx8UaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=t+omLnrfXrbI8RJrVGC3Mq/5jVzMv1ZA 5bPZDYvCgAOGm6MY7PyXdp1MiyGo2/0Rzq1riXnD89Qb66fSs/I7NrtEmsyB880w e26FticvvoSywSzVoUNfJvu9FztIbjmL86z9Fguolhpj+cHQz4unS3wjDB9W0KcC 1y408jPhhhY= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9B94503A; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:04:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06C4D45038; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:04:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Matthieu Moy Cc: Larry Finger , Jeff King , Mathieu Lienard--Mayor , Remi Lespinet , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Formatting problem send_mail in version 2.10.0 References: <41164484-309b-bfff-ddbb-55153495d41a@lwfinger.net> <20161010214856.fobd3jgsv2cnscs3@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161010215711.oqnoiz7qfmxm27cr@sigill.intra.peff.net> <45cfc4e5-c30e-19cb-ec3e-407ceb4e3ad5@lwfinger.net> <5978b674-02eb-59ad-9468-93203533575f@lwfinger.net> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:04:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Matthieu Moy's message of "Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:32:26 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 51DF5CEA-9230-11E6-A0E3-987C12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Matthieu Moy writes: > We clearly can't guess, but we can be consistent with Mail::Address, so > that git's behavior depends less on its availability. > > Patch follows doing that. Thanks. I love that somebody counters with a much better way to solve it whenever I suggest an outrageous non-solution to a problem around here ;-)