From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1A1C48BE5 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAFC613CD for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235000AbhFQAb1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:31:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51469 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234994AbhFQAb0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:31:26 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4917B74E8; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:29:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mjo4wY2bUBdYrBrqOsOO+mru93hhUnP84Gafn0 ywEkk=; b=ootbNQFZcdMNCpbatIEKTsGvpUFaatlwj7UooQ7bMXHofjbX46KTjV wYCcNZIvOUVwfzQ6QBuH5q8sCy+JXWU9YDAO5n18/XWtqRl6kEHj95BlOrJTGWCr YC7GNx2IJEgIS2areKBy2NrqjM1QB2NDhkf6WBczUF9Gzdr3pEKj4= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F4DB74E7; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:29:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.36.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A1B6B74E6; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:29:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Andrei Rybak , =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7Ru?= =?utf-8?B?Zw==?= Danh Subject: Re: [PATCH] test-lib: fix "$remove_trash" regression and match_pattern_list() bugs References: <87k0muxcd7.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:29:18 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:50:44 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0E177C12-CF03-11EB-933B-8B3BC6D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > My thought was that the subshell takes us back to the original state, > regardless of what it was. As opposed to "set +f" which takes us back to > a particular state. But it is unlikely that we'd have done a global "set > -f" before calling this, so maybe that is being overly conservative. Overly conservative, yes, but if it is not too much overhead, I think it is a good practice anyway.