From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF5FC433EF for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243321AbiAJTL5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:11:57 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:50962 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240681AbiAJTL4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:11:56 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF8C17F2F5; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:11:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=xjdhTm5zraqCmC3ru1DcBtXkWStcx7IOfvZGSG O21VE=; b=idnkgAOMg1mv6hs/E4dU4ISWvs/yh+/p9J8jwvHF4xgEtR1cppHUiB I0NsGB9yjJAeKo1B5avOlXMx3xOlaq+lf03SiTp27EAlRF/QYZUBAXcpRINWkmfI IgWQzBlfyFDIxXQ3FuJHWidKgbrDzi/gIsAaN2hgLZC/lFEQiqPaw= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4748317F2F4; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:11:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B392017F2F3; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:11:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: John Cai Cc: John Cai via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , phillip.wood123@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-stdin References: <153f69ea9b6cfc3fff47c91fa237cf97efd6bfae.1641425372.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <56FFAD1E-D081-4D13-A12E-DD6807375B69@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 11:11:52 -0800 In-Reply-To: (John Cai's message of "Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:01:06 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2BF877A6-7249-11EC-9FCD-C85A9F429DF0-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org John Cai writes: >> As I said, my mention of hidden vs non-hidden was not my preferrence >> of non-hidden over hidden, but was soliciting opinions from others, >> so I was a bit surprised to see a reroll to change only that thing >> and nothing else so soon. >> >> But if it is your preference to leave it unhidden for now, that is >> fine as well. I have no strong preference over the matter either >> way. > > I think it makes sense in this first iteration to keep it > non-hidden for visibility purposes. Maybe in the next release we > can make it hidden before we move it altogether. I think that is a sensible way forward.