From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rebase: test ack Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:30:26 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1400447743-18513-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1400447743-18513-4-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20140520143850.GA13099@redhat.com> <20140521125246.GA21476@redhat.com> <20140521173950.GA24564@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 21 20:30:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WnBHh-0005Hu-3I for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 20:30:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752677AbaEUSac (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 14:30:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:61806 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751857AbaEUSac (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 14:30:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1FF18194; Wed, 21 May 2014 14:30:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=khCxYJElucMviiHP5CyBYInIzFc=; b=ERfRsB 4Bk7MzKy5WXDGZc1xxadRgN/9w/jmZ4WfaJcXTf9aaZhF5HJ4NqD34H95kGME3FA KMdZy9nseI/C9Xro7Sda9dBPcZIjilkWVoUIxOyxsOqA6w2BTa355k6jz/jNL4VN 172H5z4mrEdkDYmy7ithMSQS8n0PTNwg+CPqM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=E/q6XeGalaNGcSZuFNljdNOfpSrHEGCy JEC5zRDHhnbwzWZekNzBY1CDdrWyaZrez5yNqHKUgh+XYfqsG9KyrdsqRnYmv2s5 YQALQ/wAw4DdZUCIMpB32gYPniS2klAyPgnBQeqpLLcM6vZ8W6pg0gHmgkUcBWNl 8nLq68+9LWo= Received: from pb-smtp0. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9436C18193; Wed, 21 May 2014 14:30:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 412541818E; Wed, 21 May 2014 14:30:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20140521173950.GA24564@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Wed, 21 May 2014 20:39:50 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FB96A924-E115-11E3-AA44-9903E9FBB39C-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:54:47AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: >> >> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:13:27AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: >> >> >> >> > Just to clarify I can post v2 of 4/4 without reposting 1-3 since they >> >> > are queued? >> >> >> >> If you need to update anything queued only on 'pu' but not yet in >> >> 'next', it is customary to ... >> > >> > Actually I don't see anything like it in pu. >> ... > Oh sorry, didn't mean to try to pressure you. I was just surprised > not to see it there. I know this applies cleanly to next so I'll just > wait for 2.0 to be out. Oh, no. No pressure felt and no need to be sorry about anything. I described a preferred procedure when the topic appeared in 'pu', and I didn't answer your question for topics that are not even in 'pu' yet. Being in 'pu' and not in 'next' is not much different from not being in 'pu', so the preferred procedure is to send out the entire series (unless it is a large 47-patch series ;-) to give everybody another chance to comment, and it would be extra nice if you indicated which ones are unchanged since the previous round to help those who did already saw them. Thanks.