All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, avarab@gmail.com, me@ttaylorr.com,
	phillip.wood123@gmail.com, e@80x24.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3] cat-file: add a --stdin-cmd mode
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:24:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqpmo7ix0l.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56f851f3-946b-0524-1643-25799ef46b55@gmail.com> (Bagas Sanjaya's message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2022 18:44:20 +0700")

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:

> On 29/01/22 01.33, John Cai wrote:
>> Future improvements:
>> - a non-trivial part of "cat-file --batch" time is spent
>> on parsing its argument and seeing if it's a revision, ref etc. So we
>> could add a command that only accepts a full-length 40
>> character SHA-1.
>
> I think the full hash is actually revision name.

There is no entry for "revision name" in Documentation/glossary-content.txt
;-)

But to John, if you have a loop that feedseach line to get_oid(), 

	while (getline(buf)) {
		struct object_id oid;
		if (get_oid(buf, &oid))
			warn and continue;
		use oid;
	}

is it much slower than a mode that can ONLY handle a full object
name input, i.e.

	while (getline(buf)) {
		struct object_id oid;
		if (get_oid_hex(buf, &oid))
			warn and continue;
		use oid;
	}

when your input is restricted to full object names?

get_oid() == repo_get_oid()
-> get_oid_with_context()
   -> get_oid_with_context_1()
      -> get_oid_1()
	 -> peel_onion()
	 -> get_oid_basic()
	    -> get_oid_hex()
	    -> repo_dwim_ref()

it seems that warn_ambiguous_refs and warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity
we would waste time on refname discovery but I see cat-file already
has some provision to disable this check.  So when we do not need to
call repo_dwim_ref(), do we still spend measurable cycles in this
callchain?






  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-31 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28 18:33 [RFC v3] cat-file: add a --stdin-cmd mode John Cai
2022-01-31 11:44 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-01-31 18:24   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-02-01  9:48     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-01  9:39 ` Christian Couder
2022-02-01 17:52   ` Taylor Blau
2022-02-01 19:27     ` John Cai
2022-02-01 20:14       ` Taylor Blau
     [not found]         ` <3FE1D509-8AD0-4F0E-9298-DFD3552A98EF@gmail.com>
2022-02-02  1:45           ` Taylor Blau
2022-02-02 13:11   ` John Cai
2022-02-01 10:43 ` Phillip Wood
2022-02-02 15:05   ` John Cai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqpmo7ix0l.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johncai86@gmail.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.