From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DB7C433ED for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4F9610CC for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244605AbhDPVnd (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:43:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:53134 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235540AbhDPVnd (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:43:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A460A116FF8; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:43:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=1HOI0iLF1fUMjOq2bTzkyC3OXK8=; b=CaCmMD DNClH0hdHF0Dows32/KWpNnfInOLzDjIcTwE6J+Lb9RNJ6y2KMj0esUtcU5a8Sxa dNAkmsZFUJqd0APtzh25u3BkWagz1D6gPOxr8qoQ/kD/AZotXPSz2HJ7VJvhUnHZ gYa/bhB6lVlnVcwvwOiAe8DClRtJfrGBPx1Is= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZYM8QXOxNCoOR8E89B2k5g3hvaQN9hxv 3EvzdxfUP2qlY0NS/pcocbsQ5VpoIIaSfCgh/BTfNyXCDhRnYFuOwFY2kaUWXSpf +W0FgPK8nm6xbESjcQHhpwMlVPQzqDgzzPJJwd7gVY4K7iJHH9lbzbsBKQ8SrVuU aEea8FrdccQ= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3E8116FF7; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:43:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDAEA116FF5; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:43:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Matheus Tavares Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com, git@jeffhostetler.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Parallel Checkout (part 2) References: Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:43:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Matheus Tavares's message of "Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:16:59 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B9BA31D6-9EFC-11EB-A699-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Matheus Tavares writes: > This is the next step in the parallel checkout implementation. As > mt/parallel-checkout-part-1 is now on master, this round is based > directly on master. > > Changes since v1: Now, I do not think we've seen any response to these messages. It seems that review comments for the earlier round cf. have been addressed? Should we merge it down to 'next' now?