From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68E3C433E0 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 17:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47D5229C5 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 17:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726241AbhAWR4S (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:56:18 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:56061 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725943AbhAWR4S (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:56:18 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEFB116C69; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:55:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=fPoQ5e6ubG/Fu6dUtIOUCUiJQzA=; b=mYfdbQEyJqYHuI/NAmkk Hn/AHryQJ/ktjZosXCflKxtG9bOoG2LFUzFJ4o6Rv8BNdABciC64d3VmDOpjn8pn rvzCFsBpZlZmhZP+SdMFMc4WfU9C8Ohny2KmAvxikwr76cdf6e1PtZqSQ/q1oQxP 3lEnbVAoHtGTy/ewx3aZ8qk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mw3PfJbkuEanfF6fFZ27SPCVhRItQzuXz8mlAe/JzknTC1 BJaWJ5QnBwoEqVUx+EPG9ifGFm7LhOzw2OE8rTBhQDoeF124ycrbUjx8LQDsf/iP JoxWuPC2bioi8U7s4aRNIxAZpHqEu8YyD71vYCQmR+XhCq8htqXKXROf/fqXs= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388C4116C68; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:55:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.36.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8395F116C67; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:55:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, jacob@gitlab.com, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ls-refs: traverse prefixes of disjoint "ref-prefix" sets References: Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:55:31 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 312665F4-5DA4-11EB-AE27-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > Here is a reroll of the series I sent yesterday to traverse the > longest-common prefixes of disjoint sets containing the ref-prefix > arguments to ls-refs. > > Not much has changed last time, except some clarification about what > 'for_each_fullref_in_prefixes()' can yield, and splitting out the last > patch into one from Jacob and one from me. I've forged his sign-off > since it contains his original code, but it includes a new patch > description from me. Oh boy I feel behind, but finally I had managed to block time to read through the two iterations of discussion on this topic without leaving my desk once, and it was a pleasant read. Thank you to all three of you.