From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F82202DD for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 01:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932186AbdJWBcS (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:32:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:61248 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932171AbdJWBcR (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:32:17 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3093DAB5CC; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:32:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7QEUhrzYV8PGyQ6cUXmP4qSVLjw=; b=ivD+Dm frbreGfp0wJZMDKr1+qkW+da+GmwCjiDvgtK8FkslyhGcYbLRqZ/BRH73kJU1SmC O6B18iW1LiLJoHQzM20VD8AoFrWLe5RS7ebaPAI58JUCgGf4XuYtqXpcksVDJXwi oiRVVgppXhb1ffG3sp6WgpjOx7gujKm6nYmt4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EJot0R/80+wPt6k+T16A9CevxTgZEoID Ug4WtZOEgQRJbtF5PRD4X5K8xf9NYz9KJHNl1qd0CvCzB/f9lOj5gBeCQmSku2yp 8ux+YA+77PmAPcLgAiIm3PsoVONLRY6H5H+dOE+HfEP13FHnLni1oImGSz1Wgc3u c0Dq1zEidWg= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28967AB5CB; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:32:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A440AB5CA; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:32:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Thomas Gummerer Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Jonathan Nieder , "Robert P . J . Day" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] deprecate git stash save References: <20171019183304.26748-2-t.gummerer@gmail.com> <20171022170409.8565-1-t.gummerer@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:32:15 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20171022170409.8565-1-t.gummerer@gmail.com> (Thomas Gummerer's message of "Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:04:06 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 00E947AA-B792-11E7-83FB-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Overall the result looks reasonable and get us closer to the ideal world where nobody recalls "stash save" has ever existed ;-) Will queue; thanks.