Re: [PATCH 2/7] merge-ort: add ability to record conflict messages in a file

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:

> I also don't like how diff.orderFile provides a global ordering of the
> files listed, rather than providing some scheme for relative
> orderings.  That'd either force me to precompute the diff to determine
> all the files that were different so I can list _all_ of them,...

Don't we determine all the files that would be listed in the diff
anyway?  The diffcore pipeline collects all the different filepairs,
matches them up for rename/copy detection, and finally do the output
formatting for each individual filepair.

> So, I'm not so sure about this solution; it feels like it introduces
> bigger holes than the ugly space character it is fixing.
>
>>  - there can be other non-diff data between the individual segments. For
>>    example, "patch" will skip over non-diff lines. And certainly in Git
>>    we have our own custom headers. I'm wondering if we could attach
>>    these annotations to the diff-pair somehow, and then show something
>>    like:
>>
>>      diff --git a/foo.c b/foo.c
>>      index 1234abcd..5678cdef 100644
>>      conflict modify/delete foo.c
>
> A couple things here...
>
> First, I'm not so sure I like the abbreviation here.  Just knowing
> "modify/delete" might be enough in some cases, but I'd rather have the
> full messages that would have been printed to the console...
>
> Second, what about when there are multiple ...
>
> Third, what about the cases where there is no diff, ...

None of the above seems like a problem to me at least from the
presentation and consumption sides.  There is no rule that extended
diff headers has to fit on a 72-char line, cannot use line folding
by inserting LF-SP in the middle of a logical line, and there
already is at least one case we give an extended diff header without
a single line of content change (namely, "chmod +x README").

Thanks.