All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net>,
	Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 23:09:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr2gv9ryx.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d44b425709d11eed833558c8bedfe4aeaa230e24.1539350061.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:14:26 -0700 (PDT)")

"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> @@ -3293,6 +3312,9 @@ static int pick_commits(struct todo_list *todo_list, struct replay_opts *opts)
>  			unlink(rebase_path_stopped_sha());
>  			unlink(rebase_path_amend());
>  			delete_ref(NULL, "REBASE_HEAD", NULL, REF_NO_DEREF);
> +
> +			if (item->command == TODO_BREAK)
> +				return stopped_at_head();
>  		}

The earlier one had "break;" here, which broke out of the while()
loop, let the control reach "if (is_reabse_i(opts)) {" block after
the loop, and the block would have noticed that current < nr and
returned 0.  So from the point of view of the overall control flow
of the caller of this function, there is no change relative to v2.
The only difference in v3 is that stopped_at_head() gives a useful
message.

Good.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-03 15:00 [PATCH 0/1] rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-03 15:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-05  8:15   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-05  8:36     ` Jacob Keller
2018-10-05 15:36     ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-09  3:59       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-09  5:27         ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-10  8:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-10  8:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rebase -i: clarify what happens on a failed `exec` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-10  9:46     ` Eric Sunshine
2018-10-11  8:15       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-12  8:36         ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-10  8:53   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-11  9:08     ` Phillip Wood
2018-10-12  8:35       ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-12 11:09         ` Phillip Wood
2018-10-12 11:24           ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-12 13:14   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-12 13:14     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rebase -i: clarify what happens on a failed `exec` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-12 13:14     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-12 14:09       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-10-12 15:31         ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-12 14:01     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Junio C Hamano
2018-10-12 15:32       ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-25 20:47     ` [PATCH 3/2] rebase -i: recognize short commands without arguments Johannes Sixt
2018-10-26  1:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-26  8:04       ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqr2gv9ryx.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=phillip.wood@talktalk.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.