From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841922018A for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 19:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752485AbcGATZn (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:25:43 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50432 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751996AbcGATZn (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:25:43 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F51275A7; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:25:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=tDmp2jAaQ47/0Rsi0YAz7qfLn84=; b=E+vOFF yPCipRPtGTGhoqYenDbnQRrAtCt4Te5bQOyzXFJH9IRk2+aHu7ISjnWcx0QRUsu3 gULIjkdxR/mXOvK1/iK6bXzlYVVTSVHuiMnuRI0zJ7pcSAvsGKiBBkOeufMIW6aY HtNvfVLILQMT9FJv4U0yRrludbKmTCQuGIU1g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SIcImPaT7gCfys3s5JVyCNmlc8rlOo/T 8f43h/Pn/0ggDIvCqsq47mQbBCTRhB/+zHwI0OtFocbWC1EzNbSRxLu4ehFT1WHr J3+5YYzPgHQE+t3r5GUGJWeJ0+bJsfBwsSyplPwXpW9VcFAPA61v9Bfp9gG4JOcE x5gp8wRDU1Y= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED00275A6; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:25:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 489A0275A5; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:25:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Stefan Beller , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Dan Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] push options: {pre,post}-receive hook learns about push options References: <20160630005951.7408-1-sbeller@google.com> <20160630005951.7408-2-sbeller@google.com> <20160701071410.GG5358@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160701175950.GB16235@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160701181102.GA16695@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 12:25:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160701181102.GA16695@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:11:02 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 99361EEC-3FC1-11E6-858E-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Compare to: > > if test "$GIT_PUSH_VAR_force" = true > ... OK. As this is a new feature, I guess it is not too bad if we tell users that they cannot have duplicate keys in their data they ask Git to transport. They can do the key1=val1 key2=val2 numbering themselves if that is really needed.