From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CB7C4338F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBBC60F01 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232533AbhG2T5U (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:57:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:54861 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229642AbhG2T5T (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:57:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B78313A980; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:57:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Ozr/czZUjjUucwovoawh9caKDHlSMlHyY3p6Gy o0Qck=; b=P72tH0banr1QoExqi0pe2vb39tkBdF/T1gEnGcFiIfqyMURl9rnZEr 5Z82m68yuRPSjxHfLM5JzFzX+bTKAyfVFTYEPnOXvjza+UTQa3FObcIpctmQNBqi ZoG7BwzAyWwn0OoFsJOkgLvcy9LICzriLMLwFngg9SrB834Ns1CUI= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D4113A97E; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:57:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.71.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31B9413A977; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:57:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Steadmon Cc: Fabian Stelzer via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys , Fabian Stelzer , "brian m. carlson" , "Randall S. Becker" , Bagas Sanjaya , Hans Jerry Illikainen , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Felipe Contreras , Eric Sunshine , Gwyneth Morgan Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] ssh signing: add test prereqs References: <18a26ca49e7a9b0046559ac8d5c62c99ea7262ae.1627501009.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:57:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Josh Steadmon's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:09:45 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 298C781A-F0A7-11EB-85BC-D5C30F5B5667-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Josh Steadmon writes: >> ... >> +GOOD_SIGNATURE_UNTRUSTED='Good "git" signature with' >> +KEY_NOT_TRUSTED="No principal matched" >> +BAD_SIGNATURE="Signature verification failed" >> + > > Is there a reason why we don't use these variables in the script above? > > Also, in general I feel that it's better to add tests in the same commit > where new features are added, rather than having standalone test > commits. Again, good suggestions. Thanks for excellent reviews.