From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFD6C433DB for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 23:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35C523130 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 23:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388764AbhALXX1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:23:27 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:52323 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387860AbhALXX0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:23:26 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C0DFD03E; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:22:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HJobCsMpv7i718Juu/ozeBEJH/g=; b=E6IDgj q2e9CTxOy0I9I8Ng5+METkcNrns0I6uOjES1yUjPfpYlGXlZIowqvSg8vLf/Ckok IPMkf1KCSdPLdBl9GM0XCL8MfsmB7+HkUBOmAG7ArQ3UdF5AS7N1HKjNbF8XZedg z2kplnPoxAKxrygmLY0Jhlbk4gixfXiPasBjo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=V9F4hDkVbw083eEaI5h/rJgNeH3aJEWb IStyN+dFIfcHIJvww+Vks0D2QUB2LCDJITiPMtqV3Cd8ZN16xk5K3RXxUcrfuMXS wlqpsAI3qEPPGsP9xIvmXDTM+9N+KW+8WfVnKp2d7FmQlkSHJAWS+rkgr77KbYbA 1aqq5iHrgko= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC5CFD03D; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:22:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECA5DFD03B; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:22:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: Johannes Schindelin , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIg?= =?utf-8?B?QXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Nika Layzell via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Nika Layzell Subject: Re: Cc'ing the Git maintainer on GitGitGadget contributions, was Re: [PATCH 0/1] add--interactive: skip index refresh in reset patch mode References: <87wnwordzh.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:22:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:18:27 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 10DEC77A-552D-11EB-9B01-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 12:18:33PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> As Taylor created the above suggestion as a counter-proposal, I can >> see that I apparently did not express what I meant very well, when I >> said: > > ...or that I must have not read your email which quite clearly states > what I was thinking of, too. ;-). Seeing that Dscho had a negative reaction to my rendering of my thought while showing positive one towards yours, I see that what I wrote wasn't clear enough to be understood to at least two people. Thanks for clearly illustrating a possible end user experience that is desiable.