From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215C8C2B9F7 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 06:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D94613F4 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 06:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232267AbhEZGJU (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 02:09:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:58038 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229520AbhEZGJT (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 02:09:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D53132EAA; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:07:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=6Jf6cuQp7QcLj6vYm2+vQIJGrz+fZAJt42C23B JtWog=; b=cIew8VgPlS9s9k/ht+TdIm+5pXz2B1Chic73on/LJxMYRoz2FPiYQU uJ5QDqVhT9HYJ/3c2oHt/6k1i5NjZsLCyr0VFPLtukaYje0Drj/UaOzi6xU2UDTl tYyJPRwMvanSKIXi46yypOhs5P07CmQJTIgYsKc8ijA4P4gDPkdxY= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBE2132EA9; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:07:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.73.10.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6094132EA7; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:07:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys , Avar =?utf-8?B?QXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , ZheNing Hu , Taylor Blau Subject: Re: CI: 'seen' minus a few passes tests, eh, almost References: Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 15:07:44 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 26 May 2021 14:32:19 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B0A9F710-BDE8-11EB-A856-D5C30F5B5667-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> It is sad that the tip of 'seen' rarely passes all tests these days. >> >> I excluded a few topics (chosen primarily by prejudice after looking >> at which tests failed earlier, without locating exactly where and >> why they fail) from 'seen' and the exclusion of them seems to have >> made 'seen' finally pass the tests, eh, almost [*1*]. >> ... >> Excluded are: >> >> ab/fsck-unexpected-type >> hn/reftable >> hn/refs-errno-cleanup >> zh/ref-filter-raw-data >> >> ... >> [Footnote] >> >> *1* Except for "git repack" segfaults only in one of the tests: >> >> https://github.com/git/git/runs/2669668815?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:2846 > > Just with a hunch, I further excluded tb/multi-pack-bitmaps from > 'seen', in addition to these four topics. It seems to pass the > whole test suite on both 32- and 64-bit build combinations. > > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/877225207 > > Except that vs-build sometimes fails to download the sdk, that is. And https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/877379968 tests the above with hn/refs-errno-cleanup added back. The usual tests all seem to pass, even though vs-build fails to download the sdk.