From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AB31F404 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 21:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162050AbeCAVnf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:43:35 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f177.google.com ([209.85.128.177]:33921 "EHLO mail-wr0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161761AbeCAVne (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:43:34 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m5so8107142wrg.1 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:43:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=fN5WGYLuVJSci9iDCvMNpWKyL9zCm3AeY9T0Twk3H7o=; b=lyRPkjyvvEb+W8blnohHK4TEn0ZWcU8QvR5eJpFVaXBY8V8GguCXltVWt09RZtZDIR vlgrv+jXEGyOOCDh67X0QGEHYr0dpjpKRSw0uy9KnCqQ3+hSv/1ldb51Zabweo5uDhik vs0DwiajsT+XxUwtwYYQjGGxoA0mXwgjpzY0MTKmHEwFrZCU/bkdOkmD/6VI1LBRYRkI uL9+C7H3kyVHEnFu28QnLZ+HHOtXISB7lLVtPBV4B5TKynXnMCvgg05QDhxy8Rg0A+zm a3lT95cSbI7D+4QvdoEGno4koZFy4pLf22F98nR+EuhfX0qMQn0kcJrH7wRbCZaHRhU3 jYhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=fN5WGYLuVJSci9iDCvMNpWKyL9zCm3AeY9T0Twk3H7o=; b=qZQt6CGAkEubG+AsKubB0NNDtqQggPrr1dUGZJRePcUV6cFN9YJOsKNKH8qwoxktKj IjpbBumKJZBDCmTdhJDigZqGu20sce2gaCsYYMZRg34hMh9/cEL1e687YdK+V3cfXfAv m8onDLnLyK28xih1JS9Ws7ep/u6nhCxoWzTnJGHxlYX2mcDwknztZOcyH/33OGpcMGoR QKkN03HvE7epAe2di8TqQqjWWOOHOcuKvu4bLB5cLyJyYODF6ryFrIzIISrjHxz93XQy zX0+39rlATsrVGNt3iNtfYxBZ73lbmIQq/Sw7Xrl4yWWWejDF8RBS7YQMNcyfJAcDnKZ ltOw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPB7FgKHmoivFJDT7IzNaQXHq/oryojSxa//eToe1DSoy3BNI3C5 ZDnPi6n/r0B0K7PdnsO91+c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsssTUjlpEoEJXedvVotYHazEy3aIyZ4IkHin/lWfY5u3IhtnCVoxcLeFPSqfaKbg/GVuAaHw== X-Received: by 10.223.156.206 with SMTP id h14mr2831189wre.281.1519940612751; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:43:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (112.68.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.68.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 62sm5144521wrf.24.2018.03.01.13.43.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:43:32 -0800 (PST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Andrei Rybak Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Obsolete instruction in SubmittingPatches? References: <48b5c506-6882-81e2-35f6-7d040bfc6017@gmail.com> <927e3166-9c60-fca5-ab41-f6d38380c1b1@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:43:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: <927e3166-9c60-fca5-ab41-f6d38380c1b1@gmail.com> (Andrei Rybak's message of "Thu, 1 Mar 2018 20:29:34 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Andrei Rybak writes: > On 01.03.2018 0:54, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Andrei Rybak writes: >> >>> Is this part of guidelines obsolete, or am I not understanding this >>> correctly? >> >> I am merely being nice (but only on "time-permitting" basis). > > Does that mean that the integration of a series is easier, when there is > a re-send? When I am not interested in a topic, or there are other reviewers who are more qualified and are interested in the topic than I am, the protocol to require the final "Here is a verbatim final resend, the only difference from what was reviewed is the reviewed-by's from the reviewers." will let me completely ignore the topic while it is being discussed (as long as I trust the judgment of these reviewers). Otherwise I'd need to keep track of the progress of the discussion on each and every topic, which is often impossible.