From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com>
Cc: "Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>,
"Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
"Neeraj K. Singh" <neerajsi@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:44:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv8wlejgc.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANQDOdcDbYHyRuJj0hV_LcYPJdkoJjF_EGN4CXpndc4VQ9dVAA@mail.gmail.com> (Neeraj Singh's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:38:45 -0800")
Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com> writes:
>> > At the conclusion of this series, I defined 'default' as an aggregate
>> > option that includes
>> > the platform default. I'd prefer not to have any statefulness of the
>> > core.fsync setting so
>> > that there is less confusion about the final fsync configuration.
>>
>> Then scratch your preference ;-)
>
> Just to clarify, linguistically, by 'scratch' do you mean that I should drop
> my preference
Yes.
> Is there a well-defined place where we know that configuration processing
> is complete? The most obvious spot to me to integrate these two values would
> be the first time we need to figure out the fsync state.
That sounds like a good place.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-04 3:28 [PATCH 0/2] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-04 3:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] fsync: add writeout-only mode for fsyncing repo data Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-06 7:54 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-04 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:44 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-07 12:14 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 23:29 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 12:18 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 23:58 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:53 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-07 20:46 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 12:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 21:44 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-08 10:05 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-09 0:14 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-09 0:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-09 4:08 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-09 6:18 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-01-18 23:50 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-01-19 15:28 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-19 14:52 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-28 1:28 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-08 0:44 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] core.fsync: add a `derived-metadata` aggregate option Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-01-08 1:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj Singh
2022-01-09 0:55 ` rsbecker
2022-01-10 19:00 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 " Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-02 0:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-02 1:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-11 21:18 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-11 23:04 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 23:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-12 0:39 ` rsbecker
2022-02-14 7:04 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-02-14 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 13:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-09 18:50 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-09 20:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 12:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 17:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 20:05 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 20:38 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] core.fsync: add a `derived-metadata` aggregate option Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] wrapper: move inclusion of CSPRNG headers the wrapper.c file Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 1:21 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 1:26 ` brian m. carlson
2022-03-10 1:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 2:53 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 7:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 18:38 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-03-10 19:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 20:25 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 21:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 13:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-10 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 9:53 ` Future-proofed syncing of refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] core.fsync: add `fsync_component()` wrapper which doesn't die Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 17:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 18:40 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] core.fsync: new option to harden loose references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 18:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 19:03 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 22:54 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-11 6:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:15 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-11 9:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] core.fsync: new option to harden packed references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] wrapper: make inclusion of Windows csprng header tightly scoped Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control infrastructure Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] core.fsync: add configuration parsing Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-28 11:06 ` Jiang Xin
2022-03-28 19:45 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-15 19:12 ` [PATCH v7] " Neeraj Singh
2022-03-15 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-15 19:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-23 14:20 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? (was: [PATCH v7] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-25 21:24 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-26 0:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-26 1:23 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? Junio C Hamano
2022-03-26 1:25 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? (was: [PATCH v7] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options) Neeraj Singh
2022-03-26 15:31 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-27 5:27 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-27 12:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-28 10:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-28 11:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-28 19:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-30 16:59 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 23:34 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 0:03 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-11 18:50 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-13 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:58 ` [PATCH v2] core.fsync: new option to harden references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-25 6:11 ` SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv8wlejgc.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=neerajsi@microsoft.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=nksingh85@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.