From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D776C4338F for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 20:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A246103A for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 20:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234502AbhHMUax (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:30:53 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60885 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233905AbhHMUaw (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:30:52 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0444EDF984; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:30:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ydyaaaW0WbnjLr4IHDZ5APCy6psi9qqYOp02q8 o64UI=; b=xGiczmLO99L9RCiaMc7PMgAUDuw2SX711HlG449psQFW/mslrIHohx eq017cc4wNWdqD1Kgs6dMttKP9jFzQsRIHbELli0aG9XrftySSVg1GBbPXDv5byQ 7oWs93b5UKyu3+BdH03GJg7MrP5ayHpAN8jbsGe20UPPpmutqNwZY= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5B7DF983; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:30:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.3.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 257BFDF981; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:30:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Emily Shaffer Cc: Mahi Kolla via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Philippe Blain , Mahi Kolla Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] clone: set submodule.recurse=true if user enables feature.experimental flag References: Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 13:30:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Emily Shaffer's message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2021 13:23:46 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 49ABD1FC-FC75-11EB-B056-8B3BC6D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Emily Shaffer writes: > I think the right move, then, is to explore whether your suggestion in > https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqeeaxw28z.fsf%40gitster.g is appropriate > - I have the sense that it is, but I want to make sure to think it > through before I say so for sure. Not that one---it was a 40% tongue-in-cheek comment, and does not deserve to be called a suggestion.