Re: [PATCH v4] [GSOC]trailer: pass arg as positional parameter

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com> writes:

> The `prepare_shell_cmd()` in "run-command.c" seem to use "$@" to pass
> shell args.

Yes. "$@" is a way to write "$1" "$2" "$3"...
Since you are passing only one, 

	echo "$@"

and

	echo "$1"

would be the equivalent.

I am not sure what program you fed to the gdb (and remote debugging
over e-mail is not my forte ;-), but let's see.

> Before exec:
>
> (gdb) print argv.v[1]
> $22 = 0x5555558edfd0 "/bin/sh"
> (gdb) print argv.v[2]
> $23 = 0x5555558f4c80 "-c"
> (gdb) print argv.v[3]
> $24 = 0x5555558ed4b0 "echo \"123\" \"$@\""
> (gdb) print argv.v[4]
> $25 = 0x5555558f5980 "echo \"123\""
> (gdb) print argv.v[5]
> $26 = 0x5555558edab0 "abc"
> (gdb) print argv.v[6]
> $27 = 0x0
>
> Some unexpected things happened here.
> Maybe "abc" was wrongly used as the parameter of "echo"?
> Looking forward to your reply.

Observe

	$ sh -c '
		echo "\$0 == $0"
		count=0
		for arg in "$@"
		do
			count=$(( $count + 1 ))
			echo "\$$count == $arg"
		done
	' 0 1 2
	$0 == 0
	$1 == 1
	$2 == 2

i.e. the first arg after

	argv[1] = "/bin/sh"
        argv[2] = "-c"
	argv[3] = "script"

is used to give the script the name of the program ($0).  Are we
getting hit by this common confusion?

It is customery to write such an invocation with '-' as the "name of
the program" thing, so that ordinary positional parameters are
available starting at $1, not $0, like so:

	sh -c 'script' - arg1 arg2 ...