From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3E3C433E0 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E056B206A5 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="fddDw0K5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390683AbgEMT12 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2020 15:27:28 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:64787 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390681AbgEMT12 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2020 15:27:28 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214DA54721; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:27:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=eXBHYdezOy23Zf7wjwy/7T/qaLY=; b=fddDw0 K5e9PG1DgeHFf3FzewsCiyHyGFNJknEz8bNADkkDDJ/4vUtb5TaqUn7u1lj2NBzT MH2Ek7mJ707hZYn9aFn7rk2IOQsbCTyPtrW2NIGGX4erYqlPz+aNxkWNOOF4GGvA nUAC4+bZdvEdpnE9tl1sAkCu6wM4FYNllHurQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=yZXbPW+dT83l/t7dQfI4qDm2fRvSTr5o WZ8AbYR0Nr7TQJYx8mk1V8SodQ74gg1qbxjNnrvosu0nfXynEWSpIIF3D7OUZH+S EybGzdz0mOx4S9IEt+UFjSQKEryHins/SY9SJOREvF/nqo5wuY+ZyfSHj6P6a0qu iJNv4DRcDcM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AE95471E; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:27:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ABDD5471D; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:27:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Safer GIT_CURL_VERBOSE References: Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:27:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Tan's message of "Wed, 13 May 2020 12:12:45 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C6A498E4-954F-11EA-86BB-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: > Thanks everyone. I went ahead with GIT_REDACT_AUTHORIZATION to match > GIT_REDACT_COOKIES, with the default being true (i.e. you need to set it > to "0" to have behavior change). Hmm, I would actually have expected us to move in the direction of deprecating specific REDACT_BLAH and consolidate them into one, instead of adding another one. Especially as the primary reason why we redact cookies is to protect those that are used for auth anyway.