From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84901C43603 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCF62072D for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="m+zLhkcA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727005AbfLQS2N (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:28:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61291 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726646AbfLQS2N (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:28:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68C11C7B5; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:28:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Lk8Qm53Q8EOc8zTrvr6aAy7gIr8=; b=m+zLhk cAVCrU2WqpTSfWx8+G6suHt1FcyZOFIJB9SX1ey6tWOup7ley3vYNdFByyKS48YK BInyj+nhF3lKdpq5EBFkCg8UyDEhq9+I5uxEiv07Vmq6a2omBDp7upP5vFYgE+nq +lOvFuu+LunrZuBI1JVM+lsSEtLcL+PQRyHjo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OlB12HmdOrpqboWsw8UPO/KdTuAoss0r gXOACKFe3SXcF5Jz4lnfSOXL/Vbigh2wRBWlVLaCNQCzBvcEyYxlyGcr3k1QFm71 YkJ3cfWqqz15bfPOz1BCUyqEWNQNtzwH7S4IfewGLyTty5j03w/iIsDWwCm5SlM4 Aw/GeseRhEw= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9751C7B4; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:28:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4CD21C7B2; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:28:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] t: replace incorrect test_must_fail usage (part 1) References: Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:28:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Denton Liu's message of "Tue, 17 Dec 2019 04:01:25 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FA0AC538-20FA-11EA-9C07-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Denton Liu writes: > The overall scope of these patches is to replace inappropriate uses of > test_must_fail. IOW, we should only allow test_must_fail to run on `git` > and `test-tool`. Ultimately, we will conclude by making test_must_fail > error out on non-git commands. An advance view of the final series can > be found here[1]. Wow. It is a bit sad to see that we had so many of them.