All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, jrnieder@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] fetch-pack: always allow fetching of literal SHA1s
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:26:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwp9iykp9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170513083615.dyfnmug35ghhy7ba@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 13 May 2017 04:36:15 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 01:46:48PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>
>> Change from v5: used "ensure_tip_oids_initialized" function instead.
>> This removes some of the muddiness (e.g. with newlist being modified
>> after the function).
>
> I don't think it really improves the muddiness. You are still calling
> the ensure function each time through the loop with a potentially
> modified list, but it doesn't actually look at the list after the first
> time. So the muddy part is still there.
>
> I think rather than changing the code, you'd do better with a comment
> like:
>
>   /*
>    * Note that this only looks at the ref lists the first time
>    * it's called. This works out in filter_refs() because even
>    * though it may add to "newlist" between calls, the additions
>    * will always be for oids that are already in the set.
>    */
>
> At which point the original all-in-one function is probably fine (as it
> avoids the "return 1 just to join the &&-chain" bit).

Yes.  I agree that the in-code comment is the best approach to the
"muddy combination of 'grabbing it for the first time' and 'the
thing that is grabbed mutates in the loop'" confusion.


  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-15  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-09 18:20 [PATCH] fetch-pack: always allow fetching of literal SHA1s Jonathan Tan
2017-05-09 22:16 ` Jeff King
2017-05-10  4:22   ` Shawn Pearce
2017-05-10  4:33     ` Jeff King
2017-05-10  4:46       ` Mike Hommey
2017-05-10 17:50         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-05-10 18:20           ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-10 18:48             ` Martin Fick
2017-05-10 18:54               ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-10  4:57       ` Shawn Pearce
2017-05-10 17:00       ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-10 18:55         ` Sebastian Schuberth
2017-05-11  9:59         ` Jeff King
2017-05-11 19:03           ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-11 21:04             ` Jeff King
2017-05-10 16:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Tan
2017-05-10 18:01   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-10 22:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Jonathan Tan
2017-05-10 23:22   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-11  9:46   ` Jeff King
2017-05-11 17:51     ` Jonathan Tan
2017-05-11 20:52       ` Jeff King
2017-05-11 10:05   ` Jeff King
2017-05-11 17:00     ` Brandon Williams
2017-05-13  9:29       ` Jeff King
2017-05-11 21:14 ` [PATCH v4] " Jonathan Tan
2017-05-11 21:35   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-11 21:59     ` Jeff King
2017-05-11 22:30 ` [PATCH v5] " Jonathan Tan
2017-05-11 22:46   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-12  2:59     ` Jeff King
2017-05-12  6:01     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-12  7:59       ` Jeff King
2017-05-12  8:14         ` Jeff King
2017-05-12 18:00           ` Jonathan Tan
2017-05-13  8:30             ` Jeff King
2017-05-12 18:09         ` Jonathan Tan
2017-05-12 19:06           ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-12  3:06   ` Jeff King
2017-05-12 20:45 ` Jonathan Tan
2017-05-12 20:46 ` [PATCH v6] " Jonathan Tan
2017-05-12 22:28   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-13  8:36   ` Jeff King
2017-05-15  1:26     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-05-15 17:32 ` [PATCH v7] " Jonathan Tan
2017-05-15 17:46   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-15 22:10   ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqwp9iykp9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.