Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Teach the builtin rebase about the builtin interactive rebase

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> Note: while this patch targets pk/rebase-in-c-6-final, it will not work
> correctly without ag/rebase-i-in-c. So my suggestion is to rewrite the 
> pk/rebas-in-c-6-final branch by first merging ag/rebase-i-in-c, then
> applying this here patch, and only then cherry-pick "rebase: default to
> using the builtin rebase".

Is this a stale comment in the context of v3, where we pretty much
know how the resulting topic should intertwine with other topics?  I
am trying to see if I have do to anything differently this time, or
just replacing the single commit while keeping the structure around
that commit the same is fine.

Also, I see there is a new iteration v8 of ag/rebase-i-in-c on the
list, sent on Sep 27th (you were CC'ed but I suspect it was before
you came back).  Are you happy with that update?  Otherwise, we
should make sure that topic is solid enough before extending
(meaning: I'd replace this one while keeping ag/rebase-i-in-c that
has been cooking in 'pu', without updating the latter).

> Changes since v2:
>
>  * Prepare for the break command, by skipping the call to finish_rebase() 
>    for interactive rebases altogether (the built-in interactive rebase
>    already takes care of that).

Thanks.