From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8102CC4332F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232414AbiLSX1R (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:27:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40722 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229489AbiLSX1Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:27:16 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 327A46383 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:27:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id q71so7228370pgq.8 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:27:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=K8lzTF2XN4Tpps5rsjwUQ9Y/fCdKHesAeCZ3r5KK4wM=; b=cZHXPPEsChtvXmOawzfJwSW57kSP7qINFrxsBl9guBWe+z0Fh4UOKvXSAqV/8dHfia JiVK5bbPpgdGJswBSAf7o/at2zbN/o7AEpbMtqQc5Iy++QqS51tQlRMOe1X8DOIej2Ux rCgVzzI6WmFR3vMza1C1Mam2wqbYqkpRQTmZr74ZkjYfWOfDT5iJU+YRt81raVO5ADbl m0lDLW/C+Hq1L15+IULJXNRRqExN6+4gKjDH6EnXH06RqL7SnTB95QQLqd4Qn1LV8o2h x+LY6FvecqxnSttu/lso8mfx5Ej5T9JX9biCLZGz13nWQmOvUPQy/NsZ+AkW1S5VSc0W pDcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=K8lzTF2XN4Tpps5rsjwUQ9Y/fCdKHesAeCZ3r5KK4wM=; b=AlaPI5WlWKhNd3YZ+zGGXRQUUqpsSxpXWTbJgNg91zWlxjUzUCLvbNRg/f6zfplaoZ 2l7tdQav37E4pEnZqS/37y8mWxvwtbj+FitE8dSRB26da7qgjDe5N6A5NseCcyvxSlmx +Sr1KadjiLoBSH+i/cflTa1fQuqkF1c79f9m3bNLFoTmLU3CMmHotIwc+TpmEtSRdjKl 41NlexjzV0ECzluhKlR4g5acxWfSpj6TRDgGl/jg1A/tyVO4Jyf9WFTyVPcxXIfmrdqZ QcUzVifR1KYG2vdyoLr3VRm8fn0sHZDSw1KHsm46zmrv6eVIcTXU7bcDBATpkmATfNRx 86CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqAWRvifRXjXmIVwd6eeOvQe6TSau+Yz/M5YeodJlGkTeoAmlxu I6nCXvhItt0FgeOoKhPoR5I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsXXPeRutFjCTaDCr5izZyqwzXxhrVevEWslnwgyW4KgWqyKHF0k05gbndBiwTkTKyenDVscw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2488:b0:577:adb7:20dc with SMTP id c8-20020a056a00248800b00577adb720dcmr14842056pfv.5.1671492434429; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u66-20020a626045000000b005771f5ea2ebsm7150189pfb.135.2022.12.19.15.27.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:27:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: "Nemmaier, Christoph" Cc: "rsbecker@nexbridge.com" , "git@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: AW: PROBLEM: "git pull -v" fails with exit code denoting a submodule syntax error References: <000b01d9112a$541c4de0$fc54e9a0$@nexbridge.com> <006a01d911b3$57e0d1b0$07a27510$@nexbridge.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:27:13 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Christoph Nemmaier's message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2022 08:02:39 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Nemmaier, Christoph" writes: >> ... >>> >>>I suspect it is the same issue as the one that triggered >>> >>> >>https://lore.kernel.org/git/f805f2da-a7e1-9fde-cc0a-04a30f79c9af@cs-ware.de/ >>> >>>which came out recently? >> >>If that is the case, perhaps the -v needs to be documented in the online help if/when this condition is fixed. >> > > > Good morning, > > it pretty sure is. The doc goes like: > >> -v >>--verbose >> >> Pass --verbose to git-fetch and git-merge. > > Intentionally or not, git-submodule is not listed. > > Anyway, I think the doc is correct, as git submodule doesn't know > '-v'. So either the internal call should drop '-v', or 'submodule' > should ignore it. Yes, cited above is exactly about doing that. The resulting 6f65f847 (submodule: accept -v for the update command, 2022-12-10) is about to hit 'next'.