From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB687C2B9F7 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 05:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F02613D3 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 05:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231839AbhEZFeB (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 01:34:01 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:59812 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231211AbhEZFd5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 01:33:57 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DF4132C33; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:32:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=w1SEeqAqMoKvaFnKnp0JDbJKTsLcsKUTAeVCM2 tZoO0=; b=WDnifnRK1JVASMlmd39mG8UOym3yEzNpKzMZL75bytGJau1Pu2hPih BV27UZ+ew64IOireSAwpzHthLY0wBnW+iQbpu9oZlagW1sWlYv9UfCqJ5HQ1VBmj B3CQZ31IQWtSVPLo+tppY+GYkNfYzZRohwz6c4YkDXqO+OEm38Ga4= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB89132C32; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:32:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.73.10.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5695132C30; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:32:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys , Avar =?utf-8?B?QXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , ZheNing Hu , Taylor Blau Subject: Re: CI: 'seen' minus a few passes tests, eh, almost References: Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 14:32:19 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 26 May 2021 07:25:20 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BDFC1560-BDE3-11EB-8E8F-D5C30F5B5667-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > It is sad that the tip of 'seen' rarely passes all tests these days. > > I excluded a few topics (chosen primarily by prejudice after looking > at which tests failed earlier, without locating exactly where and > why they fail) from 'seen' and the exclusion of them seems to have > made 'seen' finally pass the tests, eh, almost [*1*]. > ... > Excluded are: > > ab/fsck-unexpected-type > hn/reftable > hn/refs-errno-cleanup > zh/ref-filter-raw-data > > ... > [Footnote] > > *1* Except for "git repack" segfaults only in one of the tests: > > https://github.com/git/git/runs/2669668815?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:2846 Just with a hunch, I further excluded tb/multi-pack-bitmaps from 'seen', in addition to these four topics. It seems to pass the whole test suite on both 32- and 64-bit build combinations. https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/877225207 Except that vs-build sometimes fails to download the sdk, that is.