From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752628AbXLDUGP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:06:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751564AbXLDUGA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:06:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:51907 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751108AbXLDUGA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:06:00 -0500 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Mike Mason , Dipankar Sarma , David Smith Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Linux Kernel Markers - Support Multiple Probes References: <20071204181845.895090222@polymtl.ca> <20071204182402.940135178@polymtl.ca> <20071204185517.GA21568@infradead.org> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:03:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071204185517.GA21568@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:55:18 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > I think this is complete overkill. We should rather get one proper > tracing infrastructure in tree instead of having multiple hacking ones > in different places. Yes, please consider this a NACK ;-) Multiple handlers for markers makes exactly as much sense as multiple handlers for colocated kprobes - and the latter we've had for years. - FChE