From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53766C433EF for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E2620891 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="o7MQxgwW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 08E2620891 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965515AbeFOCHo (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:07:44 -0400 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:38936 "EHLO aserp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965440AbeFOCHl (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:07:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5F23uAE037776; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:07:04 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=to : cc : subject : from : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=hFGjZl2zM6CbnYti9FdoE6OUqvBJMuwG6kXhNGMMuzE=; b=o7MQxgwWRDziM3NlXlheDdCfavAWLR0Kyh9edoQBdkSZ4JgLX/HD5Opt7T2ZTWUTBEi4 lnGIGa6Mqzjer5yYf4d7oAeuQksqmT+la/3p2e1M7x0BXnm1xbB6L3M1+7TspDOdJVmq XxeuQE8yXxRd4RbsL7sLh1K2Lbe/Ak+EEhX5t+fE/93U2/g0ceRiOUU+fr+oVt9R8JZi PsauEZgG5XZtrUddB6T6BwjrOQlWCWxtIRa17Wg7BfszJzvohDQguA/wHGqLZtZt4a9C ayenSa92SR688dwq0tebF29UNHPKKIGrdSxRSLoKTA4K5kGpB84p1MzZjlQF1ebskHmB 5w== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2jk0xrq7va-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:07:03 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w5F272VF000788 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:07:03 GMT Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w5F271IB022906; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:07:02 GMT Received: from ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com (/10.159.214.123) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 19:07:01 -0700 To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross , qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com, Kent Overstreet , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:06:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> (Matthew Wilcox's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:05:42 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8924 signatures=668702 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=88 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=88 mlxscore=88 mlxlogscore=-84 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1806150020 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthew, > Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not > as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a > worthy reduction in lines of code. Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this series through my tree? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:06:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Juergen Gross , Jens Axboe , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kent Overstreet To: Matthew Wilcox Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> (Matthew Wilcox's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:05:42 -0700") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Matthew, > Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not > as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a > worthy reduction in lines of code. Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this series through my tree? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:06:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> (Matthew Wilcox's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:05:42 -0700") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Juergen Gross , Jens Axboe , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kent Overstreet Matthew, > Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not > as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a > worthy reduction in lines of code. Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this series through my tree? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering