From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:28:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <51AC1440.7020505@zytor.com> <51ACBAA0.40604@zytor.com> <51ACD511.4030604@zytor.com> <51AE2A8C.4080508@zytor.com> <51AE3441.3000208@zytor.com> <51AEA4FE.3060900@zytor.com> <20130606142747.1fc17b7f@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com> <20130610101505.33b32d07@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com> <20130612131543.1c79e077@notabene.brown> <51B7F41F.9000605@zytor.com> <51B8153D.1040708@itwm.fraunhofer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51B8153D.1040708@itwm.fraunhofer.de> (Bernd Schubert's message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:29:17 +0200") Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bernd Schubert Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , NeilBrown , Joe Lawrence , "Martin K. Petersen" , Dan Williams , linux-raid List-Id: linux-raid.ids >>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Schubert writes: Bernd> please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the code Bernd> optimistically enabled WRITE_SAME for any drive, except of those Bernd> on a sata (libata) controller. Correct. WRITE SAME has been used extensively by RAID manufacturers for years. So pretty much any SCSI-class drive supports it. The headache we ran into in this case was SATA drives behind a SAS controller. Bernd> Martins patch should improve that (I still need to test it on our Bernd> hardware), Please do! James wants a tested-by from someone that's not me before he pushes the patch to Linus. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering