From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A264C43613 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF741206BF for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="TncfCkCs" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726877AbfFTUbp (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:31:45 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:49844 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725864AbfFTUbp (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:31:45 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5KKO7b2045039; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:31:40 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=to : cc : subject : from : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=bzZ/vey85ZOyM6UCX3UVr/ugcoMZG3hCWevREbPYSBk=; b=TncfCkCsfsHNQwScZezZFnK49Beecoe1syBOJ2GnbLbTyiTZ5LiT/g1I5qeTmTps9Uk9 hSa1jwNAgBShYWeWQq+HOex8YdFcoxiVQdQW3LJ7uiu/zcZFTNQSGzcRj3KlpKMQx72A HJqmZ13QFau7gb3dQ8TIOlcE3lEjKt1GE0+2tleUoCa6uoYoyjUNhS5KY8exiYon1v/t VjfVx+HZErrOY94SOGnI5IolET4cLXk5X5qVALj7nSZ6vCpEUpyEOm9TvuW8Tmoxwaa+ 9Uj1Q9IKPicDKBx/57dxGHz0whUGfgut9x1LyprmYfkB2tkjP08t+C/sq2wY+Y5tvsr7 ew== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2t7809k52q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:31:40 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5KKVeJN004907; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:31:40 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2t77yntttb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:31:39 +0000 Received: from abhmp0020.oracle.com (abhmp0020.oracle.com [141.146.116.26]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x5KKVY19028073; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:31:35 GMT Received: from ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com (/10.159.214.123) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:31:34 +0000 To: Marcos Paulo de Souza Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: devinfo: BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES for SanDisk Cruzer Blade From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <20190618013146.21961-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> <20190618013146.21961-2-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> <20190619094540.GA26980@continental> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:31:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190619094540.GA26980@continental> (Marcos Paulo de Souza's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:45:43 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9294 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906200146 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9294 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906200146 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marcos, >> What's your confidence level wrt. all Cruzer Blades handling this >> correctly? How many devices have you tested this change with? > > I've tested three Cruzer Blades that I have at hand, and all of them > have VPD support, and also checked with a friend of mine that also > have one. I can't say about "all others" but so far, 4/4 devices that > I tested have VPD. (They were all SPC-3 or SPC-4 compliant). That's not a very large sample. However, SanDisk have traditionally been pretty good wrt. spec compliance. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering