From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: ufshcd: Fix device links when BOOT WLUN fails to probe
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 22:50:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1czqrguch.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35b2bd0f-5766-debd-2b4c-c642a85df367@acm.org> (Bart Van Assche's message of "Thu, 5 Aug 2021 14:49:30 -0700")
> Since patch 1/2 went in through Greg's tree, if patch 2/2 goes
> upstream via Martin's tree, will the resulting kernel be bisectable if
> Linus pulls Martin's tree before he pulls Greg's tree?
Also, this patch will need to be rebased on top of 5.15/scsi-staging due
to all the UFS churn in this release.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-16 11:44 [PATCH V4 0/2] driver core: Add ability to delete device links of unregistered devices Adrian Hunter
2021-07-16 11:44 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] driver core: Prevent warning when removing a device link from unregistered consumer Adrian Hunter
2021-07-21 15:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-16 11:44 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: ufshcd: Fix device links when BOOT WLUN fails to probe Adrian Hunter
2021-07-17 18:02 ` Avri Altman
2021-08-02 5:45 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-08-02 7:03 ` Avri Altman
2021-08-04 15:33 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-08-05 21:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-06 2:50 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2021-08-06 12:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-08-06 13:04 ` [PATCH V5] " Adrian Hunter
2021-08-10 3:21 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-08-17 3:17 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1czqrguch.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.