From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: end to end error recovery musings Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:42:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <664A4EBB07F29743873A87CF62C26D705D6DDB@NAMAIL4.ad.lsil.com> <20070227190236.58323a40@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070227233946.7ad33a50@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <45E587C2.5010209@torque.net> <1172683822.3374.13.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1172683822.3374.13.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> (James Bottomley's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:30:22 -0600") Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: dougg@torque.net, "Martin K. Petersen" , Alan , "Moore, Eric" , ric@emc.com, Theodore Tso , Neil Brown , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux-ide , linux-scsi , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Mark Lord , Jens Axboe , "Clark, Nathan" , "Singh, Arvinder" , "De Smet, Jochen" , "Farmer, Matt" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Mizar, Sunita" List-Id: linux-raid.ids >>>>> "James" == James Bottomley writes: James> However, I could see the SATA manufacturers selling capacity at James> 512 (or the new 4096) sectors but allowing their OEMs to James> reformat them 520 (or 4160) 4104. It's 8 bytes per hardware sector. At least for T10... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering