From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] block: Deprecate the use of the term sector in the context of block integrity Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:26:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1401334128-15499-1-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <1401334128-15499-6-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <20140611164538.GA9511@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:31484 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754222AbaFLA1N (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:27:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140611164538.GA9511@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:45:38 -0700") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , axboe@fb.com, nab@daterainc.com, sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig writes: Christoph> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:39PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >> The protection interval is not necessarily tied to the logical block >> size of a block device. Stop using the terms sector and sectors. Christoph> This does more than just renaming symbols, so it needs a Christoph> better description or even better splitting into separate Christoph> patches. The only thing I see that does more than a rename is the interval calculation tweak. I'll put that in a separate patch. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering